Some pretty big phrases there! Let's just list them down for now.An expert is someone widely recognized as a reliable source of knowledge, technique, or skill whose judgment is accorded authority and status by the public or their peers.
- widely recognized
- reliable source
- judgement is accorded authority
- peers
What really remains to be settled is how we can benchmark a person's 'expertness'. I figure the four traits listed above could be a start, but most of them tend to raise questions. How 'widely' is enough 'widely recognized'? Just who are your 'peers'; people you work with, people of like mind?
I guess this is more of a controversy than a debate, but what the heck! :)